Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry / Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent ; 30(1):49-50, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-1315222

RESUMEN

A mental health "echo-pandemic" is unfolding as the short and long term physical and mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue unabated across the globe. The mental health effects are felt at the general population level through COVID's impact on the education and healthcare systems, the economy as well as increased psychiatric symptoms in vulnerable groups and fatigue and burn-out in front-line workers. As children and adolescents head back to classes, parents worry about adequate safety measures and a second wave of new infections on the one hand while weighing the impact of social isolation on their children's development on the other. In this letter we propose Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Vaccination (CBT-V) as a strategy that integrates COVID-related public health measures with the best evidence-based psychological intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

3.
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol ; 10: 2045125320942703, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-683127

RESUMEN

People with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) might have several risk factors for delirium, which could in turn notably worsen the prognosis. Although pharmacological approaches for delirium are debated, haloperidol and other first-generation antipsychotics are frequently employed, particularly for hyperactive presentations. However, the use of these conventional treatments could be limited in people with COVID-19, due to the underlying medical condition and the risk of drug-drug interactions with anti-COVID treatments. On these premises, we carried out a rapid review in order to identify possible alternative medications for this particular population. By searching PubMed and the Cochrane Library, we selected the most updated systematic reviews of randomised trials on the pharmacological treatment of delirium in both intensive and non-intensive care settings, and on the treatment of agitation related to acute psychosis or dementia. We identified medications performing significantly better than placebo or haloperidol as the reference treatment in each population considered, and assessed the strength of association according to validated criteria. In addition, we collected data on other relevant clinical elements (i.e. common adverse events, drug-drug interactions with COVID-19 medications, daily doses) and regulatory elements (i.e. therapeutic indications, contra-indications, available formulations). A total of 10 systematic reviews were included. Overall, relatively few medications showed benefits over placebo in the four selected populations. As compared with placebo, significant benefits emerged for quetiapine and dexmedetomidine in intensive care unit (ICU) settings, and for none of the medications in non-ICU settings. Considering also data from indirect populations (agitation related to acute psychosis or dementia), aripiprazole, quetiapine and risperidone showed a potential benefit in two or three different populations. Despite limitations related to the rapid review methodology and the use of data from indirect populations, the evidence retrieved can pragmatically support treatment choices of frontline practitioners involved in the COVID-19 outbreak, and indicate future research directions for the treatment of delirium in particularly vulnerable populations.

4.
BMC Med ; 18(1): 215, 2020 07 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-645688

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus pandemic calls for a rapid adaptation of conventional medical practices to meet the evolving needs of such vulnerable patients. People with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may frequently require treatment with psychotropic medications, but are at the same time at higher risk for safety issues because of the complex underlying medical condition and the potential interaction with medical treatments. METHODS: In order to produce evidence-based practical recommendations on the optimal management of psychotropic medications in people with COVID-19, an international, multi-disciplinary working group was established. The methodology of the WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines in the context of a public health emergency and the principles of the AGREE statement were followed. Available evidence informing on the risk of respiratory, cardiovascular, infective, hemostatic, and consciousness alterations related to the use of psychotropic medications, and drug-drug interactions between psychotropic and medical treatments used in people with COVID-19, was reviewed and discussed by the working group. RESULTS: All classes of psychotropic medications showed potentially relevant safety risks for people with COVID-19. A set of practical recommendations was drawn in order to inform frontline clinicians on the assessment of the anticipated risk of psychotropic-related unfavorable events, and the possible actions to take in order to effectively manage this risk, such as when it is appropriate to avoid, withdraw, switch, or adjust the dose of the medication. CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence-based recommendations will improve the quality of psychiatric care in people with COVID-19, allowing an appropriate management of the medical condition without worsening the psychiatric condition and vice versa.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Psicotrópicos/efectos adversos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Pandemias , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Salud Pública , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA